On Time

Last year at this time, I was pleased to receive an email with “Congratulations” in the Subject line. I’d been chosen as one of the 30 poets for the Common Language Project. Yesterday, I received another email with the name of the project as the subject and the message “We know that a rejection email can be disappointing…” This link contains the rules, the 30 required words, and the names of the winners—whose names are, in fact, quite interesting.

The truth is that I thought my poem for 2024 was much better. I can barely read it even now without a catch in my voice. Last year, not so much. It is the same this year. I think it’s better than last year. Everything is subjective. That’s not entirely true, of course, but in winner selection, I’m comfortable with the idea.

The premise of the poem on time is that not only does it not exist; it will also end. That’s just physics, as well as my belief system. The “spots of time” with the two little girls’ dresses is clear in my mind—the place, the time of day, the feelings. A package arrived at my grandmother’s house from a family friend and former employee who cooked and cared for her children (I’m going to leave that for effect to see if anyone catches it.) This woman and her sisters quilted and canned vegetables and continued to cook gloriously. These dresses were blue and pink gingham. Whichever one was to be mine was not the one I wanted. That I was three years older than my sister and therefore bigger did not matter to my young brat brain. I have repented.

Below are my prize-losing poems. I’ll collect them elsewhere.

 

A Brief Future of Time

In our minds, we were all there at the crack of it—

Big Bang! a rush of time and matter and light woven, breaking

A threshold of Nothing and by extension: Us, drawn, dragging

Into not enough of it, wasted, “Time’s up—put your pencils down.”

The ache of losing it, the tarnish of bright futures as they veer

Into catastrophes of skies gone grey then black then…

An interruption from soil left fallow that will fold again into another

Nothing—something—nothing—over and over and over?

A dial that is cracked—repaired—cracked—again and again?

The rhythm of a meter to quicken—faster—faster—ending—repeating?

Or perhaps not. No branches yield multiverses, no fishing pole

With a line dropped, a long lengthening line bobbing into eternity

Down and down and down eternally.

Instead, time may be, literally, nothing. Capital N Nothing,

Arranged for us to enter and exit, stories to begin and end

With us trapped—clocked—snapped in its (our) middles.

Einstein’s stubborn illusions made heavy: all friction marks gone.

Or Wordsworth’s spot of time binding generations:

Remember those dresses that came in the mail, wrapped in brown paper?

Pink, blue ginghams with flowers chicken-scratched Xs round the hems?

And I wanted the blue, so did you, and we argued? I’m sorry, now.

Now, I’d keenly rejoice if a dress came, gifted, to and from, with love.

Remember?

Eternity is a place to stay, to harbor, to be and be and

Stay/on/a/static/axis and be forever a never-setting sun but

Home

Closing the chapter, done and over

At Home. At Long Last, Home.

 

 

“Eve” deleted and unpublished so eligible for submission to Plough contest.

Disagreeing Better

I just finished The Count of Monte Cristo on PBS, but I haven’t read the book. From what Wikipedia says, there are dramatic changes. The novel is over 1000 pages, and I found it a little tedious—the 20 pages I read. The graphic for this post reflects the idea of hope which is, in fact, the message that Edmond Dantés (the Count) receives from the priest who befriends him in prison. It balances the other one: “If you seek revenge, dig your own grave first.” The action of the novel shows the results of his actively seeking revenge from the guilty by depriving them of hope.

If Dantès shows us what happens when hope is stripped away, the conversations I heard this week pointed in the opposite direction—how it might be restored. Twice this week, I had the opportunity to hear Governor Spencer Cox of Utah and his wife, Abby. The state has a good reputation for its laws on non-discrimination and religious freedom. They were the first to institute 988 as a universal hotline for suicide prevention. Gov. Cox was the first candidate to sponsor a joint ad with his opponent in which they agree to accept results of the election. It’s a minute worth watching.

The work of Robert Putnam figured in their remarks, as did that of Jonathan Haidt. Bowling Alone and The Anxious Child were the two most quoted works. And Marcus Aurelius, Blaise Pascal (sort of—the idea of a “God-shaped” hole in our hearts.) Finally, Yuval Levin, especially his last two books, A Time to Build and American Covenant.

The takeaways are more cogent and doable than one might think for a politician. Charismatic but not superficial, challenging but not impossible. Cox’s initiative as chair of the governor’s association is called Disagree Better. It’s now a nonprofit with ideas and outreach. He isn’t saying not to disagree. Indeed, he says disagree more. Just leave out the hate.

  • A sense of community has been lost but can be found. Read Putnam.
  • Children are in serious danger. Read Haidt.
  • Reaching across the aisle, standing up against hate, and finding better ways to disagree will take effort. Talking about “those people” and hating the haters are two behaviors to avoid. Read Cox. His Off Ramp: How to be a Peacemaker in an Age of Contempt comes out in September.
  • Don’t worry about changing the world. Help your neighbor. Hate flees service to others. Change your town.
  • The pendulum is beginning to swing from the me/I to the we. And we can help that effort.

Spencer Cox and his wife are 50. I remember when that sounded old. Now, I think he should run for president. I told him so. Does he want to? No. Neither does his wife. Watch the video. There’s something in his eyes, and it’s rather beautiful. I didn’t tell him that.